Imagine there’s no freedom. It’s easy if you try.
On the American university campus, you don’t have to imagine.
On Saturday morning (4 March 2017) I began by reading the full description of an attack on freedom of speech.
The Vermont newspaper Addison Independent reported (here)
A “controversial speaker” was shouted down, not allowed to speak
Further attempts to stop the speaker in an on-air broadcast resulted in pulling multiple fire alarms
The speaker and a professor were violently accosted, sending the professor to the hospital
The car used to transport the speaker and professor was beaten, jumped on, and blocked from leaving campus by protesters
Imagine an African-American woman who served as secretary of state who was protested into not coming to campus. One doesn’t have to imagine: this happened to Dr. Condoleezza Rice.
Imagine an African-American man who serves on the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal who had a speaking invitation rescinded (later reinvited). One doesn’t have to imagine: this happened to Jason Riley.
Imagine an Arab-American woman who is a human rights activist whose invitation to present a commencement address was rescinded. One doesn’t have to imagine: this happened to Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
Former Stanford Provost John Etchemendy did not have to use his imagination when he spoke this past month to the Stanford University Board:
Over the years, I have watched a growing intolerance at universities in this country . . . a kind of intellectual intolerance, a political one-sidedness, that is the antithesis of what universities should stand for.
It manifests itself in many ways: in the intellectual monocultures that have taken over certain disciplines; in the demands to disinvite speakers and outlaw groups whose views we find offensive; in constant calls for the university itself to take political stands.
We decry certain news outlets as echo chambers, while we fail to notice the echo chamber we’ve built around ourselves.
We will write off those with opposing views as evil or ignorant or stupid, rather than as interlocutors worthy of consideration.
Freedom to hear other points of view often begins with a faculty. Instead of encouraging students to hear those with whom they may disagree, dis-invitation reigns.
I call upon my fellow academics, Christian or non-Christian, liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, gay or straight, Black or White, to adhere to the following ideals in civil, university discourse:
Stop using caustic, inflammatory, violence-inciting rhetoric toward any person
Invite those with whom you disagree into your classrooms, programs, and commencements
Encourage a spirit of openness, generosity, and grace in all verbal communication
Welcome debates with other academics who have opposing views on campus
Alert students to the weakness in your own biases as you point to the strength of opposing perspectives
“I state my opinion to classmates but write my papers saying what my liberal professor wants to hear. I want to graduate.”
Imagination is not necessary.
University freedom of speech is assaulted every day.
Mark’s students regularly heard the opposing viewpoints from atheists themselves in his Christian high school classrooms. Now Mark encourages conservative university students to read liberal perspectives and liberal students to read conservative perspectives. [Labels such as “liberal” or “conservative” are only helpful in addressing cultural generalities but are generally unhelpful in academic-intellectual discussions. The words are used here only reflecting current, cultural vocabulary.] Dr. Mark Eckel is President of The Comenius Institute.
Picture credits: Wikipedia, Stanford.edu